tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post111498535744081743..comments2017-03-09T11:25:26.636-08:00Comments on Fermat's Last Theorem: The ProblemLarry Freemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-33751403861565075382013-07-03T05:06:41.971-07:002013-07-03T05:06:41.971-07:00sir,
I was busy with the proof of Phythagoras the...sir, <br />I was busy with the proof of Phythagoras theorem,I have some Differential equations with the help of which i formulate proof of Fermat's theorem i want you to check my results.Rashid ullah khan hunxaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09716584296048447087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-4249703002815063202013-07-03T05:05:12.194-07:002013-07-03T05:05:12.194-07:00sir,
I was busy with the proof of Phythagoras the...sir, <br />I was busy with the proof of Phythagoras theorem,I have some Differential equations with the help of which i formulate proof of Fermat's theorem i want you to check my results.Rashid ullah khan hunxaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09716584296048447087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-32450762435718979792012-05-29T12:29:06.484-07:002012-05-29T12:29:06.484-07:00Hi Madhu,
I'm just an amateur. So, I don'...Hi Madhu,<br /><br />I'm just an amateur. So, I don't have any contacts.<br /><br />My recommendation is to write up, post it somewhere public, and get feedback. Most likely, you have made some significant mistakes. Even Andrew Wiles made a giant mistake.<br /><br />If you have thought it through deeply enough, you will be able to recover from some of the mistakes. If you believe your argument still holds, then try to publish it on http://arxiv.org/.<br /><br />If you post it somewhere public, you can link to it in the comments on this blog.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />-LarryLarry Freemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-9370962331852570782012-05-29T11:37:39.871-07:002012-05-29T11:37:39.871-07:00Sir,
I guess i have found a simpler proof for ...Sir,<br /> I guess i have found a simpler proof for fermat's last theorem... I wish it to be recognised by the right people.... I think that you know the right contacts so can you please help me??????Madhu Sudhanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06518385330803405017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-1125465409317726442005-08-30T22:16:00.000-07:002005-08-30T22:16:00.000-07:00Hi Justin,Thanks very much for the details on the ...Hi Justin,<BR/><BR/>Thanks very much for the details on the translation!<BR/><BR/>-LarryLarry Freemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-1120670352712178522005-07-06T10:19:00.000-07:002005-07-06T10:19:00.000-07:00You may appreciate seeing this famous quote in the...You may appreciate seeing this famous quote in the original Latin:<BR/><BR/>"<I>Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadrato-quadratum in duos quadrato-quadratos, et generaliter nullam in infinitum ultra quadratum potestatem in duos eiusdem nominis fas est dividere cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.</I>"<BR/><BR/>I will translate this more literally than I would normally, just so you can see how the Latin works:<BR/><BR/>"But to divide a cube into two cubes, or a doublesquare into two doublesquare and generally no power up to infinity from beyond the square into two of the same name, is not permissible. Of which thing I have of course uncovered a wonderful proof. The smallness of the margin would not be able to contain it."<BR/><BR/>Especially interesting is the the first meaning of <I>fas</I> is permissible in a <B>religious</B> sense. Something like "in accordance with divine law." It is possible to use it in a broader sense, but I enjoyed the implication that finding a solution to x^3+y^3=z^3 would be a sin! ;)Justinhttp://livejournal.com/~jdm314noreply@blogger.com