tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post7144421569454938143..comments2024-02-26T06:55:41.876-08:00Comments on Fermat's Last Theorem: Fermat NumbersLarry Freemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-85113727391279087082013-09-29T14:19:52.543-07:002013-09-29T14:19:52.543-07:00Hello, I am new on this subject but I believe that...Hello, I am new on this subject but I believe that I can prove that all the Fn>F4 are composites. Please let me know if someone else already proves this . If not please let me know how or where to submit my finding.<br />Thanks,<br />Mui NguyenAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14722207689552147264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-7788538173580545652009-11-08T22:23:35.041-08:002009-11-08T22:23:35.041-08:00Hi Neat Maths,
I agree with your suggestion.
I&#...Hi Neat Maths,<br /><br />I agree with your suggestion.<br /><br />I've updated the blog to use "Fermat Number" instead of "Fermat Prime".<br /><br />-LarryLarry Freemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-30383861612144981852009-11-08T04:55:28.607-08:002009-11-08T04:55:28.607-08:00"Despite all these efforts, no other Fermat p..."Despite all these efforts, no other Fermat prime has been found to be prime and no proof has been offered that would resolve this issue" <br /><br />I think you meant "No other Fermat NUMBER has been found to be prime"neat_mathshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09923473294000429170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-53363011109109534242008-07-16T14:28:00.000-07:002008-07-16T14:28:00.000-07:00Hi Emac,According to wikipedia, it is true for 5 &...Hi Emac,<BR/><BR/>According to <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_primes" REL="nofollow">wikipedia</A>, it is true for 5 ≤ n ≤ 32.<BR/><BR/>Remember, F(16) = 2^(2^16) + 1 which is an odd number.<BR/><BR/>-LarryLarry Freemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-10918184813054640362008-07-16T14:16:00.000-07:002008-07-16T14:16:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Emac98https://www.blogger.com/profile/07820851143247804166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-53989420445249682032008-04-09T01:22:00.000-07:002008-04-09T01:22:00.000-07:00Hi Hanelifou,Thanks for noticing that. I've updat...Hi Hanelifou,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for noticing that. I've updated my blog entry. :-)<BR/><BR/>-LarryLarry Freemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06906614246430481533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12535639.post-9453755574360842662008-04-08T23:26:00.000-07:002008-04-08T23:26:00.000-07:00Small typo: You say F(sub n) = 2^(2^(n)) are Ferma...Small typo: You say F(sub n) = 2^(2^(n)) are Fermat primes, but I take it you mean F(sub n) = 2^(2^(n)) + 1.hanelifouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18096865230210492122noreply@blogger.com