Lemma 1:
if a,b,c,d,e are the roots of:
x5 - x4 - 4x3 + 3x2 + 3x - 1 = 0
then:
a + b + c +d + e = 1
Proof:
(1) Using the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (see Theorem, here), we know that:
x5 - x4 - 4x3 + 3x2 + 3x - 1 = (x - a)(x - b)(x - c)(x -d)(x -e)
(2) From this it is clear that the coefficient for x4 is the sum of -ax4 + -bx4 + -cx4 + -dx4 + -ex4
Thus, we have:
-1(x4) = -ax4 + -bx4 + -cx4 + -dx4 + -ex4
(3) Dividing -x4 from both sides gives us:
1 = a + b + c + d + e
QED
Lemma 2:
If:
a2 = -b + 2
b2 = -d + 2
c2 = -e + 2
d2 = -c + 2
e2 = -a + 2
and
ab = -a -c
bc = -a -e
cd = -a -d
de = -a-b
ac = -b -d
bd = -b -e
ce = -b -c
ad = -c - e
be = -c -d
ae = -d -e
Then:
(ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie)n = Aa + Bb + Cc +Dd + Ee + F
where
A,B,C,D,E,F are functions consisting solely of combinations of ρki (it does not include a,b,c,d or e)
Proof:
(1) The statement is clearly true for n=1.
(2) Assume that it is true up to some n-1 so that we have:
(Aa + Bb + Cc +Dd + Ee) *(ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie) =
Aa[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Bb[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Cc[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Dd[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Ee[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie]
(3) Aa[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] =
Aρ1ia2 + Aaρ2ib + Aaρ3ic + Aaρ4id + Aaρ5ie
(4) Since a2 = -b + 2, ab = -a -c, ac= -b -d, ad=-c - e, ae=-d -e
Aρ1ia2 + Aaρ2ib + Aaρ3ic + Aaρ4id + Aaρ5ie =
Aρ1i[-b + 2] + Aρ2i[-a -c] + Aρ3i[ -b -d] + Aρ4i[-c - e] + Aρ5i[-d -e]
(5) We can make the same type of argument for:
Bb[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Cc[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Dd[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie] +
Ee[ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie]
so we are done.
QED
Theorem 3: The Eleventh Root of Unity is Solvable by Radicals
Proof:
(1) Using Lemma 1 here, we have:
x10 + x9 + x8 + x7 + x6 + x5 + x4 + x3 + x2 + x + 1 = 0
where x is an eleventh root of unity and x ≠ 1.
(2) Using Lemma 1 here and setting y = -(x + x-1), we can simplify the equation to:
y5 - y4 -4y3 + 3y2 + 3y - 1 = 0
(3) Using the fundamental theorem of algebra (see Theorem, here), we know that there are 5 roots ot this equation which we can label: a,b,c,d,e
(4) The plan of attack for solving this equation is to use Vandermonde's equation (see Theorem, here) to return a,b,c,d,e as its answers.
(5) So for values: a,b,c,d,e, we have:
where
Vi = (ρ1ia + ρ2ib + ρ3ic + ρ4id + ρ5ie) where each ρk is a distinct 5th root of unity.
(6) Let ω be a primitive a fifth root of unity. [See definition here]
(7) Then, we can choose ρk such that (see Theorem 3, here):
ρ1 = 1, ρ2 = ω, ρ3 = ω3, ρ4 = ω2, and ρ5 = ω4
(8) So,
Vi(a,b,c,d,e) = a + ωib + ω2id + ω3ic + ω4ie
and
Vi(b,d,e,c,a) = b + ωid + ω2ic + ω3ie + ω4ia
(9) This then gives us that:
Vi(b,d,e,c,a) = ω-1Vi(a,b,c,d,e)
(10) We can use the same logic to confirm that:
Vi(a,b,c,d,e)5 = Vi(b,d,e,c,a)5 = Vi(d,c,a,e,b)5 = Vi(c,e,b,a,d)5 =
Vi(e,a,d,b,c)5
since (ωk)5 = (ω5)k = (1)k
(11) Now, applying Lemma 2 above, we get:
Vi(a,b,c,d,e)5 = Aa + Bb + Cc + Dd + Ee + F
where A,B,C,D,E,F are rational expressions in ρ1, ..., ρ5
(12) Reusing the same function in step #11 gives us:
Vi(b,d,e,c,a)5 = Ab + Bd + Ce + Dc + Ea + F
Vi(d,c,a,e,b)5 = Ad + Bc + Ca + De + Eb + F
Vi(c,e,b,a,d)5 = Ac + Be + Cb + Da + Ed + F
Vi(e,a,d,b,c)5 = Ae + Ba + Cd + Db + Ec + F
(13) From step #10, step #11, and step #12, we have:
5Vi(a,b,c,d,e)5 = (A + B + C +D +E)(a + b + c + d +e) + 5F
(14) Using Lemma 1 above, we know that a + b + c + d + e =1, so we have:
5Vi(a,b,c,d,e)5 = (A + B + C +D +E) + 5F
which is the same as:
Vi(a,b,c,d,e)5 = 1/5(A + B + C + D +E) + F
(15) Now, since (a + b + c + d + e) = 1, we have as our solution:
where
Vi(a,b,c,d,e)5 = 1/5(A + B + C + D + E) + F
and
A,B,C,D,E,F are functions of the fifth roots of unity which are expressible by radicals based on a previous result from de Moivre (see Theorem 1, here)
QED
Here is the solution that Vandermonde came up with:
x = 1/5[1 + Δi + Δii + Δiii + Δiv]
where:
Please note that in Vandermonde's original work, there was a mistake. Professor Tignol sent me the corrections which I have updated above. This mistake was noticed by Oscar Luis Palacios-Velez.
References
- Jean-Pierre Tignol, Galois' Theory of Algebraic Equations, World Scientific, 2001
No comments:
Post a Comment