In a previous blog, I showed how de Moivre came up with his famous formula based on the work of Francois Viete. In today's blog, I will show how he provided a proof for the existence of the roots of unity.
In 1739, de Moivre used his formula to find the nth root for any complex number (a + bi).
Theorem 1: For any complex number, there are n distinct nth roots.
if a,b ≠ 0, then:
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
Proof:
(1) Let a,b be real numbers such that either a ≠ 0 or b ≠ 0
(2) We note first that:
(3) Since:
It is clear that:
And further that:
(4) Therefore, there exists φ such that [see here for review of cosine if needed]:
(5) Since cos2(φ) + sin2(φ) = 1 (see Corollary 2, here), we can see that:
sin2(φ) = 1 - cos2(φ) =
(6) So that we also have now:
(7) We can now conclude:
since:
(8) Using De Moivre's formula (see Theorem 1, here), we know that:
(9) From the basic properties of sin and cosine, we know that:
cos(φ + 2kπ) + isin(φ 2kπ) = cos(φ) + isin(φ)
(10) Multiplying √a2 + b2 to both sides gives us:
(11) Combining step #7 with step #10 gives us:
(12) Now, we know that each of the values are distinct for 0 ≤ k ≤ n-1 since none of the angles vary by a multiple of 2π.
QED
Corollary 1.1: Roots of Unity
There are n roots of unity such that:
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
Proof:
(1) Let a=1 and b=0
(2) Then a+bi = 1+0*i = 1
(3) Using Theorem 1 above, we have:
(4) Using step #4 and step #6 in Theorem 1 above, we have:
and
(5) So, φ = 0
(6) Since:
we are left with:
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
QED
Corollary 1.2: Roots of -1
There are n roots of unity such that:
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
Proof:
(1) Let a=-1 and b=0
(2) Then a+bi = -1+0*i = -1
(3) Using Theorem 1 above, we have:
(4) Using step #4 and step #6 in Theorem 1 above, we have:
and
(5) So, φ = π
(6) Since:
we are left with:
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
QED
References
- Jean-Pierre Tignol, Galois' Theory of Algebraic Equations, World Scientific, 2001
2 comments:
i want some more information about that book that is 1000 or more pages by pierre de fermat.
and some mroe about dr wise.
thanks
this is my mail: ladans.07@gmail.com
Hi Ladan,
Thanks very much for your comment. I am very glad to hear about your interest. :-)
Pierre de Fermat only published one proof which I have already blogged about.
I assume that you are referring to the 100-page proof by Professor Andrew Wiles of Fermat's Last Theorem. Here is a link if you would like to go to it directly.
There are also excellent web pages that provide a good overview of Wiles' proof. Here's one to look at. And here's another. Hopefully, these links address your question. :-)
I am going through the history of group theory which is needed to understand Wile's very complex proof.
My goal is to provide a complete proof including all of the underlying mathematical assumptions.
I am still working through Kummer's proof which was the most important proof prior to Wiles' brilliant work.
Cheers,
-Larry
Post a Comment