In a previous blog, I showed how de Moivre came up with his famous formula based on the work of Francois Viete. In today's blog, I will show how he provided a proof for the existence of the roots of unity.
In 1739, de Moivre used his formula to find the nth root for any complex number (a + bi).
Theorem 1: For any complex number, there are n distinct nth roots.
if a,b ≠ 0, then:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/278f2/278f28865546f5aeefdae929966730a20e601a8a" alt=""
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
Proof:
(1) Let a,b be real numbers such that either a ≠ 0 or b ≠ 0
(2) We note first that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca6e3/ca6e33a2c9d3d5c9348416c7cd3720fb21ae19ea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb125/fb1257eeec94615227940cc88d15531eda59e6a9" alt=""
(3) Since:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/300de/300def7cc0bcb5d88d0b1695ac296a33b562583a" alt=""
It is clear that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83506/835069d5f02308f3ecfb5ee12565d4e69d3d4dfb" alt=""
And further that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9996c/9996c00706a73c7fdee76d3c81da5236877fae4a" alt=""
(4) Therefore, there exists φ such that [see here for review of cosine if needed]:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4de18/4de1860e6277337d881326e83edde746158a355d" alt=""
(5) Since cos2(φ) + sin2(φ) = 1 (see Corollary 2, here), we can see that:
sin2(φ) = 1 - cos2(φ) =
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71e5b/71e5b472fa04f0159c21de964a0a0892cd2388e5" alt=""
(6) So that we also have now:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/465d5/465d5fe4d39ef8e756399fea1a112828b3581718" alt=""
(7) We can now conclude:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fb40/2fb40adf161ab7c60f058bda2e28a57d4d13c801" alt=""
since:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdd68/fdd6846ddb6d6cd598840bc3224cfe3d05bf400c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86bc4/86bc45ce591b0987e9276c5e67a6d0ef66d2651e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f51/b5f5147f55563746eadcfb84911b6fe6e9986a89" alt=""
(8) Using De Moivre's formula (see Theorem 1, here), we know that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/116a1/116a172991202d4a589754839412c7f20d8deaa6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/accf1/accf1a4162aac29e88c43c7604845ba3c67f98ca" alt=""
(9) From the basic properties of sin and cosine, we know that:
cos(φ + 2kπ) + isin(φ 2kπ) = cos(φ) + isin(φ)
(10) Multiplying √a2 + b2 to both sides gives us:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92226/922269ca65d036e31b02cc182b8fcf583262e106" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/170ee/170ee86c893336c52cd27667c3871278c9f35ac6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9409/e94096bed08cda33819df64224ea3f824412bca8" alt=""
(11) Combining step #7 with step #10 gives us:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/278f2/278f28865546f5aeefdae929966730a20e601a8a" alt=""
(12) Now, we know that each of the values are distinct for 0 ≤ k ≤ n-1 since none of the angles vary by a multiple of 2π.
QED
Corollary 1.1: Roots of Unity
There are n roots of unity such that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e39/77e395f61f3bdc948e8657a133984d0b52373ff4" alt=""
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
Proof:
(1) Let a=1 and b=0
(2) Then a+bi = 1+0*i = 1
(3) Using Theorem 1 above, we have:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd26b/bd26b5848c76d224db990b0c8fe81e43d7b2554f" alt=""
(4) Using step #4 and step #6 in Theorem 1 above, we have:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71c2d/71c2de81c4dae6905669598cf82ac957ae70cd87" alt=""
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32396/3239689641994dde04059ab9e15fbaab8b9bd658" alt=""
(5) So, φ = 0
(6) Since:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/316db/316db92709157bcab607aac5855145669063fb54" alt=""
we are left with:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e39/77e395f61f3bdc948e8657a133984d0b52373ff4" alt=""
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
QED
Corollary 1.2: Roots of -1
There are n roots of unity such that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65b35/65b359691ae83ee649a46d4d6ee87f2e6afa211c" alt=""
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
Proof:
(1) Let a=-1 and b=0
(2) Then a+bi = -1+0*i = -1
(3) Using Theorem 1 above, we have:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540a066610433e5aba7d47a85ace6557d296115" alt=""
(4) Using step #4 and step #6 in Theorem 1 above, we have:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118f3/118f3d36a33d78cab5c73d38ac04eca8e306a8b5" alt=""
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59d81/59d818b543f4630643801ba580e78e16bf1b7b66" alt=""
(5) So, φ = π
(6) Since:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e681f/e681fd5584ed1d336aabd9b379efef69e4dfd673" alt=""
we are left with:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68030/680305e4cb8a96b1ece50cee450018332d91829b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65b35/65b359691ae83ee649a46d4d6ee87f2e6afa211c" alt=""
where:
0 ≤ k ≤ n-1
QED
References
- Jean-Pierre Tignol, Galois' Theory of Algebraic Equations
, World Scientific, 2001
2 comments:
i want some more information about that book that is 1000 or more pages by pierre de fermat.
and some mroe about dr wise.
thanks
this is my mail: ladans.07@gmail.com
Hi Ladan,
Thanks very much for your comment. I am very glad to hear about your interest. :-)
Pierre de Fermat only published one proof which I have already blogged about.
I assume that you are referring to the 100-page proof by Professor Andrew Wiles of Fermat's Last Theorem. Here is a link if you would like to go to it directly.
There are also excellent web pages that provide a good overview of Wiles' proof. Here's one to look at. And here's another. Hopefully, these links address your question. :-)
I am going through the history of group theory which is needed to understand Wile's very complex proof.
My goal is to provide a complete proof including all of the underlying mathematical assumptions.
I am still working through Kummer's proof which was the most important proof prior to Wiles' brilliant work.
Cheers,
-Larry
Post a Comment